Student Fined $675K for Illegal Music Downloads 
Home Theater News Music - Download Technology News
Written by AVRev.com   
Tuesday, 04 August 2009

Joel Tenenbaum, a 25 year old grad student at Boston University, has been told to pay damages of $675,000 to four record companies for sharing music on the internet.  During the case, Tenenbaum was found guilty of downloading / sharing 22 songs via Kazaa in 2004.  That's a sizable $22,500 for each illegally shared track.

During the trial Tenenbaum told the court that he downloaded more than 800 songs over the last 10 years.  A RIAA spokesman told reporters that the $675K in damages will the invested in "ongoing education and anti-piracy programs".  This decision comes just two months after a 32 year old single mother was ordered to pay the record companies $1.92 million for sharing 24 songs on the internet via Kazaa.
   Comments
Add New | Search
  
DAVID KAPLAN  - Tennenbaum   |2009-08-05 12:47:46
Last time I checked, stealing other people's property was still considered
stealing. Even if you think you are entitled to steal.
He got off lightly.
Daniel Robbins   |2009-08-06 17:20:27
He should pay for the retail cost of the songs he did not pay for, which would
come to about $800 on Amazon.com digital download, maybe up to $2000 if you have
him buy the full albums on CD at suggested retail.

I do agree that you should
purchase all your music (and I purchase all of mine on CDs, and I do not share
my digital rips) but these damages are excessive and only serve to de-legitimize
the RIAA.

I would support the RIAA if they took sane steps to encourage
purchasing of music, or went after huge offenders, but this kind of stuff is
just insane. Let the punishment fit the crime. Downloading 800 songs over the
course of ten years just isn't a serious crime and should not result in damages
over $5000. For every one person they try to milk like this, 100,000 more people
start illegally downloading their music out of spite for the RIAA, in my
opinion.
Ken Lim   |2009-08-26 16:51:11
Remember, the RIAA annoounced last year they would not be going after
individuals anymore. These 2 cases are just the results of long trials.


Although I completely agree with David & Daniel above, the facts are that the
record companies (are they still called that?) are the ones doing the ripoffs as
well. A movie costs ~$10-100 million, 100s of people and a few months to a few
years to make, yet theater tickets cost ~$8-10 & DVDs are sold for $10-$20.
Compare that to the music industry where music can be created in a few
day-months for maybe 1% the cost of a movie, yet they charge $50-100 for a
concert ticket and the same $10-20 for a CD!
And...Anybody else out there old
enough to remember when vinyl albums cost $7-9 and we complained loudly about
the $16 CDs? The RIAA promised that as the tech got cheaper the price of new
release CDs from name artists would drop below vinyl! In 27 years since, has
anyone ever seen a new CD sell for $6.95?!?!

There IS a reason why music is
being ripped off...and its not just because of digital ease!
Jeff   |2009-10-03 13:42:58
Absolutely ridiculous penalty! This guy will never be able to pay the fine, so
the RIAA's claim that this will help anti-piracy education is bunk. And they
know it. This was about punishment, and making an example of this student. It is
not about justice in sentencing. Yes, he did wrong, but this will alter the
course of a 25-year-old student's life. At least some team of attorneys are
getting a good bonus this year. They must be proud.
logan demizio   |2010-03-21 05:50:41
fuck that eveyone and there brother downloads music this guy should not pay one
red cent ....i currently have over 1200 songs downloaded and shared and no one
came bitchin to me.....leave this poor guy alone
David M   |2010-10-26 20:15:45
NO! The record companies are just butt hurt that they are losing profit. The
artists are the ones putting their necks on the line, while the big music
executives sit on their fat asses all day and do nothing. I'm all for
capitalism, and would be the first to defend it. However, at the same time I
believe there should be a code of ethics involved... The music companies are
not being ethical at all. They are being greedy. Besides, Illegal downloading
isn't hurting the artists at all because they make 90% of their money on tour.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."








Like this article? Bookmark and share with any of the sites below.
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!StumbleUpon!Yahoo!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
 
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio