equipment reviews
This Month's Featured Equipment Reviews
DH Labs Mirage USB Cable Review
SOtM sHP-100 Headphone Amplifier & DSD DAC Review
Marantz PM5005 Integrated Amplifier & CD5005 CD Player Review
Musical Fidelity M6si Integrated Amplifier Review
Denon AVR-X3100W Home Theater Receiver Review
Latest AV News
Loudspeaker Forum Topics:
Classic Speaker System Reviews
Past Speaker System News
 
Energy Take 5.2 Home Theater Speaker System  Print E-mail
Home Theater Loudspeakers Speaker Systems
Written by Tim Hart   
Wednesday, 01 August 2001
Article Index
Energy Take 5.2 Home Theater Speaker System 
Page 2

Setup and Listening
While installing the Energy Take 5.2’s into my two-channel rig, I had to smile at the sight of the 2.2’s with my Audio Truth Forest speaker cables hanging off the back of them. But the one-quarter-inch spade lugs fit perfectly. These are some pretty serious speaker terminals for a speaker in this price range, especially considering how bad the speaker terminals are on some comparably-priced speakers.

I set the Energy front 2.2’s five feet from the side walls and three-and-one-half feet away from the front wall. This setup was not optimum for the bass support, but it provided the best tonal balance and the sound staging was good. The S8.2 sub blended well sitting centered and just back of the 2.2’s.

I started my listening off with Shawn Mullins’ Soul’s Core (Sony Music Entertainment). This disc is my current favorite tool to use for discerning the differences in components. The 2.2’s ability to locate instruments between the speakers is good, with a fairly deep soundstage, which is a nice surprise on an entry-level speaker. My first impression of the 2.2 is that it has more weight than its size would suggest.

The second impression is that The Energy Take 5.2 system has a pleasant tonal balance that really separates it from other speakers in the field. I have heard other systems that lack a nice blend from midrange to lower frequencies, which is a problem due to the difference in size of the drivers. In my bigger room (16’ by 26’), the 2.2’s and the S8.2 do a decent job at filling up my space with a sound that is a little lean yet detailed, with a nice body to the sound. After getting the levels adjusted on the S8.2, the subwoofer presents a quick and tight sound that has a nice punch to the lower frequencies. Energy did it right with the S8.2 by not trying to plumb the deep octaves at the expense of control. The S8.2 blends well with the 2.2’s, as the speakers never seem to be in competition with each other in terms of volume.

Next up was Tool’s Lateralus (Volcano Entertainment). Is it fair to expose such a demure speaker to the sound of modern-day, heavy-hitting art rockers like Tool? I can’t think of a better endurance test than "The Grudge." The hammering bass riff, with the synchronized kick drum at the opening, is taught and fairly dynamic, although not as fleshed out as I have heard it on my $50,000-plus reference music system. However, my room is larger than I would recommend when using these speakers, and which hold up well under this situation. And Take 5.2 shouldn’t be compared to the large-scale, $11,000 per pair Martin Logan Prodigy’s I now use in my reference system.

Moving on to the Cranberries’ To The Faithful Departed (Island Records), Delores O’Riordan Burton’s trademark vocals on "Free To Decide" are centered and slightly behind the speakers. The sound staging is impressive, with an accurate location of instruments and vocals that provides a satisfying musical experience. The 2.2’s do not give me the detailed layering or the air of higher-priced speakers, but they deliver a surprisingly large sound from a very small package.

I moved the S8.2, the 1.2 and the 2.2’s into my theater setup, using the Yamaha RX-V3000 7.1 channel receiver and the Toshiba 9100 progressive scan DVD player. I started off with The Green Mile (Warner Home Video). One difference I have noticed between two-channel and multi-channel listening is how much louder the Take 5.2 system played with all of the speakers, as opposed to just the two 2.2’s and the S8.2 sub. Then again, movies usually have a bigger presence than two-channel music.

When Michael Clarke Duncan’s character, prisoner John Coffey, first heals the warden played by Tom Hanks, the cloud of particles that comes out of his mouth surrounds you and has an effect of making you feel you are in the middle of the cloud. The lights give off a low-level hum and the cloud has a very unusual buzz to it that requires the sound system to be accurate to make this perception engaging. The 2.2’s do a credible job of conveying that perception and the S8.2 handle the low-frequency information to round out the scene. Not too bad for a small speaker!

In Hollow Man (Columbia/TriStar Home Entertainment), Kevin Bacon is playing cat and mouse with his coworkers in the steam-filled hallways of the underground lab. Bacon’s voice travels around through all of the speakers as he toys with first one victim, then another. The speakers match seamlessly and never make one more obvious than the other.

In another chapter, the scientific team tries to "bring back" a gorilla they have already invisible. The thrashing and screaming of the gorilla comes through with a dynamic, slightly polite presentation that didn’t stress the 2.2 satellites to duress, but the sound did compress a bit at the higher volumes. I’m really picking nits here, as I think the 2.2’s do a commendable job for their physical size. I have found that I need to remind myself that this is a small speaker system that sounds big, not the other way around. All of the Hollow Man dialogue is nicely balanced and very clear. I did not notice any substantial lobing effect you can sometimes get with two horizontally mounted woofers of the same type.

The Downside
When you take into consideration the audio/video situations the Take 5.2 speaker system was designed for, there isn’t much you can criticize. The system does have physical and performance limitations, but these are only a pressing issue if you put the system to use in a room that is too large, or listen to it at ridiculously loud levels. Unfortunately, the literature enclosed with the speakers is a bit confusing regarding the exact setup of the subwoofer crossover, which could lead to installation struggles for those who will set up their Take 5.2’s themselves.

Conclusion
Energy has made the right improvements to the Take 5.2 to make it possible for this system to sell like hotcakes for another four years. The system’s tonal balance, presence and accuracy are among the best in to be found in speakers in this class. The seamless matching and dynamic presentation provided by the 2.2’s, the 1.2 and the S8.2 is a very engaging package for music, and especially for movies. I don’t think you could spend $900 more wisely than on the Energy Take 5.2. If you have a small budget and a small room, the Energy Take 5.2 will not disappoint you.
Manufacturer Energy Speakers
Model Take 5.2 Home Theater Speaker System
Reviewer Tim Hart





Like this article? Bookmark and share with any of the sites below.
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!StumbleUpon!Yahoo!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!


 

 
  home theater news  |  equipment reviews 
  blu-ray reviews  |  dvd  |  theatrical reviews  
  music download reviews  |  music disc reviews
  contact  |  about-us  |  careers   |  brands 
  Subscribe to Us   |   RSS   |  AVRev Forums
  front page  |  virtual tours  |  dealer locator
  how to features  |   lifestyle & design articles
  Want Your Home Theater Featured on MHT?
   CE Partners: HDD  |  HDF  |  VGT  |  SD  |  DVD
   
  Advertise with Us | Specs | Disclaimer
  Sponsors | privacy policy | terms of use
  909 N. Sepulveda Blvd. El Segundo, CA 90245
  Ads: 310.280.4476 | Contact Us
  Content: 310.280.4575 | Mike Flacy