|Is Plasma Technology on the Decline?|
|Home Theater Feature Articles Video Related Articles|
|Written by Dick Ward|
|Thursday, 26 February 2009|
Page 2 of 2
Perhaps even more helpful for LCD televisions is the familiarity that so many consumers already have with them. Nearly every office worker is now working on an LCD monitor, using a laptop featuring an LCD, and upgrading to a nice LCD on their home computer. It’s simply not a stretch to bring that knowledge into the living room. Familiarity means a great deal to people. When faced with the choice of a reliable technology that’s familiar and something they just don’t know much about, the average consumer will forego any technical advantage and take the devil they know over the devil they don’t.
The California Energy Commission is working on creating a standard that would be even stricter than the one being carried out in the EU. Part of the proposal will include labels to show California consumers the amount of money saved on energy bills. The first round of regulations is set to go into effect in 2011 if the new standards are passed, with a second wave coming just two years later. If the CEC’s plan is indeed more extreme than that of the European Union, Californians may be kissing their Plasmas goodbye.
There’s heavy opposition working Plasma technology on various fronts, but it’s not dead yet, not by any means. While Pioneer was certainly a well known and respected name in the Plasma game, they only had a 5% market share. LG, Samsung and the market leader Panasonic are still making Plasma televisions. They’re all capable of making TVs that are high quality and affordable, and capable of making the next amazing Plasma, but to survive, they’re going to have to take some steps.
First and foremost, there needs to be a strong campaign to correct the misinformation surrounding the technology. Plasmas don’t burn in from regular TV watching and game playing, and even if somehow a screen does start retaining images, there are ways to take care of it. Companies also need to encourage consumers to take care of their televisions as if it were a thousand dollar investment, which conveniently enough, it is.
Companies need to work with stores to ensure the best viewing areas for their TVs. Just as DLPs suffered horribly in image quality when customers hovered a foot away from them, Plasmas are up against unrealistic lighting and ultra bright LCD settings. Say what you will about big box type stores, Best Buy is at least attempting to pull this off with their higher end Magnolia sections of stores. With a smaller ceiling, dimmer lighting, and appropriately placed seating, it’s an excellent place to get a good feel for the real difference between LCD and Plasma. Adding to that, rather than a store feed of commercials, Blu-ray players are often hooked up showing not just the latest Hollywood blockbuster, but movies that look great in high definition.
Finally, and possibly the most difficult adaptation, is that of power consumption. There’s no doubt that Plasmas need more power than LCDs, and while to the average consumer it may only mean a dollar or two a month on the electric bill, to an ever increasingly green thinking populace, it makes a huge difference. If laws such as that being proposed by the California Energy Commission are passed, many Plasma sets would be outlawed as they stand now.
So is the time of the Plasma over, is it a dead technology? Not quite yet. As long as there are educated consumers buying them, Plasma will stick around. With some changes, Plasma could make a huge comeback; otherwise it will remain sadly niche.