|Richard Gray's Power Company 400s Power Conditioner|
|Home Theater AC Power AC Power|
|Written by Bryan Southard|
|Thursday, 01 June 2000|
Page 2 of 2
It was recommended that I try the Richard Gray’s POWER COMPANYs in a variety of methods. Since the units have parallel circuitry, and claim to have no sonic degradation whatsoever, the use of multiple units in what is called a cluster was recommended.
The first recommended test was to merely plug one POWER COMPANY into the circuit that the components were connected to, without plugging anything into the POWER COMPANY itself. The theory behind this is that available current from the POWER COMPANY will bleed back into the line and into your components. I found modest although definite improvements. There were increased dynamics and an audible improvement to the openness of the midrange. I then plugged all components into one POWER COMPANY and found increased performance over the previous test. Improvements were substantial in the midrange, upper mids and highs. These improvements were similar to, but much greater than, the improvements that I found when listening to my system during the late evening hours when neighbors were asleep and power demands were down.
I next tried the cluster theory, which was recommended by the manufacturer. This set-up refers to plugging multiple POWER COMPANYs into one another, thus increasing the overall available current. The thought of this made me uneasy, due to my feeling that if there were any negative sonic characteristics, they would be multiplied or compounded. During this sound test, I looked very carefully for sonic signatures rather than sonic improvements. The reasoning behind this was that if there were any sonic colorations, they would be twice as obvious. Intriguingly, they introduced no obvious degrading artifacts. I played with plugging different components into each other, separating the transport from the DAC, then trying the power amplifier on its own. In each of these experiments, I found sonic differences, each much improved upon the untreated power.
I found improvements to the overall image focus. The images had a more complete three-dimensional make-up. I found a greater sense of separation between the physical instruments and acoustical surroundings, such as hall or studio reverberation, within the recordings. The presentation had increased coherence, which made recordings unquestionably more palpable.
These improvements were made to my reference system, which has few flaws and is extremely revealing. When I auditioned the POWER COMPANY in my mid-fi second system, I found the improvements to be noticeable but not overwhelming.
Many of the improvements that this product can provide are based on several variables. One of these is how good your untreated power is, which depends on many factors, such as the number of houses that share your transformers, along with the type of appliances that you and everybody else have connected. Then there’s wiring and so on. Performance also depends on how good the power supplies are in the components that you are connecting to it. Seemingly, the better the power supply, the less improvement that you will achieve, although this is a Catch-22, because the better the power supply, typically the better and more revealing your system is, and the more evident improvements are. The manufacturer suggested that possibly the best plan was to buy a slightly less demanding component and connect it to better power for better overall performance. All I have to say about that is, it’s a call that you would need to make personally. One thing that I do know is that the best power in the world can’t make an Adcom sound like a Krell. The manufacturer laid many claims that I did not have either the time or the opportunity to evaluate. One assertion was that the POWER COMPANY will make your system run cooler and, for tube owners, make elements last longer. It is said to improve the picture of your TV and/or projection TV, making it brighter and better. I tried this with my 35-inch tube and found no visible improvement. I would guess that Richard Gray's Power Company works better on a CRT projector, or a system with a better video front end. AudioRevolution.com plans to test this in our new reference system in coming months.
Just as you thought you had a grip on what would make your system right, someone else comes along telling you where else you need to spend your hard-earned cash. For those who own these $40,000-plus monster systems, what’s another $700? Although $700 is a seemingly reasonable cost for a product that competes with others that cost as much as two and three times more, it may appear to be just another overpriced tweak to many consumers. Is this just another product targeted at rich audiophiles or, as the manufacturer advertises, the product for all who want more out of their components? After auditioning, you tell us. I think the former rather than the latter.
I have addressed virtually every aspect of my playback system, including room treatment, vibration damping and even proper cable organization for best performance. However, for whatever reason, I have fallen in with the masses and ignored my power, even after recognizing that I had a problem. So here we are with the golden question:
Does the Richard Gray’s POWER COMPANY work? Yes it does, and well.
A couple of major electronics manufacturers I spoke with endorsed the product and recommend it with their equipment. Is it the best product of its type? There are dozens of products that claim to improve the quality of your power and the sound of your system. This one has a design philosophy that seems right.
Bad, inconsistent power is everybody’s problem. Although $700, or perhaps even $1,400 for two, isn’t mega-dollars, it’s enough for me to recommend that you test-drive the product first before you buy. If you are someone who is always looking for another way to improve your system’s sound, try one or more of these. They work.