Audio Video Revolution Forum  

Go Back   Audio Video Revolution Forum > Everything HDTV, High-end Video, HD DVD, Blu-ray and beyond > Satellite Receivers, DVRs & Cable Boxes

Satellite Receivers, DVRs & Cable Boxes Having firmware issues with your DVR? Does your TiVo always miss the last few minutes of the game? Does your MPEG-4 cable box have issues? Discuss here.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2008   #1
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Bloomfield, Michigan
Posts: 147
Thumbs down Comcast Blurs High Def Image...

From The New York Times - April 08, 2008

Is this how you treat your customers when you're the largest cable provider?
________________________________________ _______________________

March 31, 2008, 3:38 pm
Comcast’s Blurry High Definition Picture

By Saul Hansell

Not only has Comcast been slowing down Internet users exchanging files with the BitTorrent protocol, it has been quietly reducing the quality of some high definition television networks it carries as well.

Most people will hardly notice the change, and the HD channels affected are still a lot better looking that standard definition signals. But Ken Fowler, a devoted high definition video aficionado did. He had Verizon’s FIOS video offering. But he also signed up for Comcast’s service in order to watch the Washington Nationals in high definition. On some networks carried by both operators, Mr. Fowler noticed that the picture quality on Comcast was inferior.

“I noticed that there was more blurring in the movement and less detail on the screen,” he said. Mr. Fowler, a financial analyst by profession, started to measure the difference between the Comcast and FIOS systems. He posted the results on AV Science Forum, a Web site for hardcore video buffs.

In images he posted, MTV and Discovery, among others, are distinctly more blurry or blotchy than those on FIOS. This occurred mainly in scenes with rapidly moving images. This makes sense as video compression systems eliminate redundant information from one image to the next, which is fine for talking heads and such, but too much compression distorts pictures of sports and other action scenes.

Mr. Fowler recorded some of these programs and found that for some channels, Comcast was transmitting 20 to 35 percent less information. Some networks, including ESPN and the major broadcast networks were not degraded, he found.

Jenni Moyer, a Comcast spokeswoman, confirmed that the company, like all cable and satellite systems, does compress its signals, but it tries hard to maintain the quality.

“Compression is a reality: We use it and other providers use it,” she said. “Our goal is not to have any kind of noticeable impact on picture quality.”

At issue here is how cable systems manage the increasing number of networks broadcasting in high definition, given the limited capacity of their networks. Cable systems are roughly divided into 6Mhz channels, each representing the amount of space one traditional analog signal would occupy. Digital cable can squeeze ten to twelve signals of standard-definition TV in one of these channels. Until recently, most cable systems put two high-definition stations in each channel.

Now Comcast is putting three signals into some of its channels. And that causes it to compress the signals more.

Comcast is not alone. Time Warner is also starting to put three high-definition networks on some of its channels.

This made me wonder whether we are going to lose some of those wonderful networks that the compression of digital cable have given us, Animal Planet, Tennis, D.I.Y., Soap and so on—because the move to HD will use all the bandwidth these networks are using.

Not so, cable experts say. The easy way to free up space on a cable system is to eliminate the remaining few dozen analog channels. This will require more people to get digital set top boxes, but some systems, including FIOS are doing this to make more space for HD channels. Also, there is technology called switched video that changes which networks are on what channels depending on what people in a given neighborhood are actually watching. Proponents say that this approach can handle an infinite number of networks, even in high definition.
Ken S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008   #2
Super Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: White Plains, New York
Posts: 1,706
Default Re: Comcast Blurs High Def Image...

It is obvious for now that if you want HD, the best source is your Blu-Ray player.
deacongreg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008   #3
Enoch's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 86
Default Re: Comcast Blurs High Def Image...

Why Cable HD Sucks HARD! And why it always will:
Compression, and recompression. For the greedy sake of squeezing a few more paid-for "Butt-Flexor 2000" channels in the mix. The revenue temptation is too great for them not to.
Enoch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008   #4
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 714
Cool Re: Comcast Blurs High Def Image...

Cancel your TV and watch movies on Blu Ray 99% of TV programing is rubbish anyway!
wes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2008   #5
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 298
Angry Re: Comcast Blurs High Def Image...

Originally Posted by deacongreg View Post
It is obvious for now that if you want HD, the best source is your Blu-Ray player.
It's the best source for movies. You can't watch a live sporting event on a blu-ray. That was my initial reason for going to HD - sporting events, namely the Superbowl, the NBA playoffs, and NCAA Football and Basketball. They should stop cheating people out of the signal that they are paying good money for (and BD nor any other format can replace live HD broadcast for sport).
prerich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008   #6
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 29
Default Re: Comcast Blurs High Def Image...

This is just another example of cable not caring and acting like they are the only game in town! They over charge and provide inferior service and product. I for one am glad I do not have to tolerate Comcast here in Phoenix. Because I would drop them in a heart beat!

While Blu-ray is going to provide the best viewing experience, it does not provide live content live cable and satellite does. And there are still plenty of HD programing that is not currently on Blu-ray. Cable companies have done things that ****ed people off since I can remember, all the way back when MTV played nothing but music videos. All I can say is cable sucks and people should dump them and get Direct TV or Dish Network!
1080p HD Supporter

HD-DVD & Blu-ray Owner

DTS-HD Master Audio & Uncompressed PCM Supporter

Last edited by Dave Moritz; 04-10-2008 at 11:11 AM..
Dave Moritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

blur, blurring, box, boxes, cable, calibration, cheater, comcast, definition, digital, hd, hdtv, high, image, mp4, picture, player, quality, satellite

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comcast Tests a New Bandwidth Throttle Ken S Satellite Receivers, DVRs & Cable Boxes 8 06-10-2008 09:03 AM
Comcast launches 50Mbps broadband TheMoose Off-Topic Posts 0 04-04-2008 12:29 PM
Blu-ray titles win big at First Ever High-Def Disc Awards Blu-ray Software 2 12-14-2007 10:05 PM
LG Unveils Their Second Generation Dual Format High-def Player Blu-ray Players 4 10-01-2007 02:38 PM
Spider-Man 3 Debuts On Blu-ray High-Def, DVD & PSP October 30 Blu-ray Software 3 08-03-2007 08:13 PM

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1