|
||
|
|||||||
| Receivers Ask your questions on AV receivers ranging from HDMI connectivity to calibration to setup to power ratings and beyond. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: THE SOUTH
Posts: 13
|
Hello to all and thanks for any responses.
Here is my dilemma. I'd like to use CANTON REF 7DC or CANTON 890DC speakers w/ the following specs Technical Data Type High-End floorstanding speaker Engineering Principle 3-way Bass reflex system Nom. /Music power handling 170 / 340 watts SPL (1 watt/1m) 88.5 db (1 W, 1 m) Frequency response 22...40.000 Hz Crossover frequency 220 / 3.000 Hz Woofer 2 x 180 mm (7''), Aluminum (Wave surround) Midrange 1 x 180 mm (7''), Aluminum (Wave surround) Tweeter 1 x 25 mm (1''), aluminum-manganese Nominal Impedance 4...8 ohms Dimensions (WxHxD) 22.5 x 105 x 33.5 cm (8.9'' x 41.3'' x 13.2'') Weight 29.6 kg Special Features DC-technology Cabinet 21 mm MDF, 2 chamber system in sandwich design High end cabling with Black Science Intergrated loudspeaker base with shock absorbers Gold plated bi-wiring/bi-amping screwclamp terminals I'm considering going w/ the new NAD T875 receiver, which admitedly I'll mainly use for music but would like to have all of the HDMI connections, Dolby surround, and XM radio available for DVD and other entertainment. I've read the NAD are conservatively rated powerwise. Will it be powerful enough for 2.1 channel and various volume levels. Or should I instead spend a little more say on NAD separates/Sunfire TGP-5/TGA 5200 amp set-up. Thanks again SK |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 1,419
|
Its alway better to get separates.
Better amps. Easier upgrade path Generally more features. j
__________________
--- Jerry Del Colliano |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Super Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,418
|
BIKER,
I just posted a bunch on your other thread, but hadn't realized you were only planning on a 2.1 system. If this is the case and you want the pre/pro for all the HDMI connectivity etal but mainly want music, then it opens up a lot of doors. Separates are always better for the reasons Jerry lists above, and for you starting out with only 2.1 channels, might actually be cheaper (for now). You can buy a pre/pro, and a good two channel amp and always add on amps later if you develop into a 5.1 or 7.1 system down the road. This frees up the funds you would otherwise tie up in a multichannel amp for a better two channel amp and as I said, you can alwaysd add more channnels of amplification later as needed.
__________________
Ken Taraszka, MD Associate Editor HomeTheaterReview |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: THE SOUTH
Posts: 13
|
KennyT,
I'm going to consolidate my threads down to the AMP/PRE-AMPS forums and speakers, regarding the CANTONS. Thanks again for the advice. BIKER |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Tags |
| amp, audio, audiovideo, channel, components, nad, processor, receiver, receivers, separate, separates, speaker, speakers, versus, vs |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help me pick my new receiver. | kennyt | Receivers | 27 | 09-16-2008 05:16 PM |
| New Receiver Help | MTIVIN | Receivers | 15 | 07-05-2008 07:55 PM |
| Versus and Golf HD Channels Get Separate Channels | tigeraudio2007 | What's on HDTV? | 0 | 06-20-2008 07:42 AM |
| Which A/V Receiver?? | mikey34201 | Receivers | 8 | 02-10-2008 04:47 PM |
| Separate Amplifier vs. Onkyo 805? | rcstevensonaz | Amplifiers (Mono, Stereo & Multi-Channel) | 1 | 12-08-2007 03:34 PM |