Could Warner Bros. Abandon HD DVD in 2008?

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by JerryDelColliano

Lotus,

Its the holidays - can you take it easy on the other guys for a day or so please?

Leave these guys some room to argue their points too and try NOT to make it personal - please!

Are you suggesting him calling me a liar with one of his first posts and "little man," and F'd Up among other things isn't personal?

What is his agenda?

He only showed up to post Pro-BD and extreme anti-HD DVD sentiment. He has never posted in threads about other things. He does this on multiple sites. He even posts reviews of HD DVDs on Amazon giving them the worst rating possible for no legitimate reason but an Agenda to defame a format.

Andrew said he would ban the person that had an agenda.

I've posted about speakers, receivers, etc. giving polite advice to your members about questions they have on many subjects not related to BD vs HD DVD.

I refer back to the fact that this thread was a 4 star rated thread just days ago. Now it's 2 stars and the only change has been his posting.

He is a person who has been banned from other sites for being a hateful individual who is incapable of making an arguement without calling people names. He definately has an agenda.

Meanwhile I've tried to be a valued member of your forum supplying my opinion on many items.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by dobyblue

Yes they do actually, numerous times in the last fourteen months.

This thread is from January 3rd, 2007. - http://forums.highdefdigest.com/showthread.php?t=1439

Read it and weep.

First I can't help but notice the word "BANNED," underneath your name there.

Second nothing in those threads proves anything. I could have guessed all of that without talking to anyone.

[dobyblue]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Are you suggesting him calling me a liar with one of his first posts and "little man," and F'd Up among other things isn't personal?

What is his agenda?

He only showed up to post Pro-BD and extreme anti-HD DVD sentiment. He has never posted in threads about other things. He does this on multiple sites. He even posts reviews of HD DVDs on Amazon giving them the worst rating possible for no legitimate reason but an Agenda to defame a format.

Andrew said he would ban the person that had an agenda.

I've posted about speakers, receivers, etc. giving polite advice to your members about questions they have on many subjects not related to BD vs HD DVD.

I refer back to the fact that this thread was a 4 star rated thread just days ago. Now it's 2 stars and the only change has been his posting.

He is a person who has been banned from other sites for being a hateful individual who is incapable of making an arguement without calling people names. He definately has an agenda.

Meanwhile I've tried to be a valued member of your forum supplying my opinion on many items.

Sure you have, that's why you threated several times to reveal personal information and call me jerk, idiot, etc.

Quit acting like a saint and brown-nosing the staff here. It's disgraceful.

While you're at it, go ahead and post all the places I'm banned from (that would be one - High Def Digest - and it's from being baited by scam artists like you) would you? I'd be interested to see that list. And all those reviews, go ahead and post some of them and point out how many of them are agenda based. My guess is you'd be lucky to find two which were probably written in August as a response to the Paramount annoucement. Hardly a habit as you try to suggest.

You're sounding like a little kid crying over spilt milk. Not having facts to back up your arguments is tough. My agenda is to discuss the facts and rebut the FUD.

[dobyblue]

Originally Posted by Lotus

First I can't help but notice the word "BANNED," underneath your name there.

Second nothing in those threads proves anything. I could have guessed all of that without talking to anyone.

Sure you could have guessed something as specific as a title's audio specs five months before it was announced when there was nothing but Dolby tracks to that point and two months beyond it...sure you could have Lotus. You don't honestly expect anyone to believe that sort of rubbish do you?

Pull the other leg, it's got bells on.

Now find any other site that I've been banned from, because I post as dobyblue everywhere.

I speak with Warner's HD Media department regularly, but I would never tell you names as that would get me into trouble.

Oh, I'm sure you could have suddenly guessed when Blood Diamond was going to be released too right, two months after the DVD release a week before the press annoucnement. Sure you could.

Please, you're sounding desperate.

[dobyblue]

As for the one place I'm banned from posting in the forums, High Def Digest, I still chat with Jed Rosenzweig, the owner of the site, regularly and even contribute articles for the news section despite not being able to post there on the forums.

The site's admins here can confirm that with Jed anytime they like.

PS - this thread is 3 stars.

[dobyblue]

In fact Lotus, why don't you show us ANYTHING you've correctly predicted?

As for my first post, you were mentioning as fact that there were only three BD50 replication facilities which was a lie, so I call 'em as I see them.

My "agenda" has been to make sure people don't read and believe pro-HD DVD agenda-driven misinformation and propaganda like most of what you post in this this thread, which is very similar I might add to the kind of stuff that Kosty, rdjam, Amir and others perpetrate on a regular basis at other sites.

1) Three BD50 replicators - FALSE, there are 8
2) BD50 yields are low - FALSE, David Vaughan is not an insider
3) Amazon numbers are not included in the Nielsen numbers - FALSE, they are included