Originally Posted by Lotus
Right but according to the article they don't really care about it unless the person is illegally giving copies away.
Still I agree it's an absurd statement on their part.
Do you really think that if the judge agrees with them they would not start using that against everyone??
If the judge agrees that makes it wide open to use against everyone.
The RIAA is rapidly becoming the new KGB & Gestapo, if they give them an inch they will take a mile.
As an example Say some big wig in the industry like Jerry makes a big editorial on how bad the RIAA is for the recording industry, do you think for one second the next day they wouldn't be knocking on his door with a warrant for his computer & if he had any of his legally purchased CD's ripped to his hard drive that they would drag him to court because some judge made it possible by finding in thier favor on this case?