Originally Posted by Stanny1
I can tell you that the owner of a cable company in Calif that starts with "audio..." lives in a multi-million dollar house in Newport Beach. You would not believe the mark-up from materials cost on the "high end" cables. Most are made in China.
Hollywood Studios are often wired with a very good quality Belden cable and field terminated. If that's good enough for mastering multi-track for your CDs and DVDs, you won't be hearing any more than the quality of that cable.
And that's the point. There are so many steps or points in the production and reproduction of music, including the fact that you lose a lot of high end as you age, that you can easily pay for what you can't hear. That high end you swear you can hear might be at 12k but your ears are attenuated at 8k. So what value is a cable that doesn't drop off until 22k?
Me, I go to PartsExpress or MCM Electronics and buy their "high-end" interconnects and speaker cable.
The solution to this mess is for all cables to be certified to some standard similar to HDMI cables. There are lots of technical parameters for cables and all could be tested. At least you could make some judgement by the numbers instead of "It sounds better".
I understand all the arguments against cable. I really do. But I would take issue with one point you made, that being that if it was made using equipment that used crap cable, then you only need that level of crap cable.....actually, the final product is what it is and better cable will allow you to hear that as unaltered as possible, or with the distortions that come with lesser cable. The fact that the source materials was made using substandard cable is irrelevant.
I'll say this one last time....test a crap cable with something like a good Transparent Audio cable. Fair or not, theoretically nonsensical or not, it will be better.